Re: Kirk Cameron and Ted Tripp
Dear Striving for Grace,
I just want to mention is that everything is subject to perception. Though Ted Tripp may have a limits in mind, when he talks of hitting children, the limits aren't laid out. Readers like those of Michael Pearl's material could apply their own interpretations on Ted Tripp's teachings in a punishment session and it could cause injury like in the Schatz case even though Ted Tripp wouldn't intend for that to happen of course. Does that make sense?
☺
Last edited by mothersson2002; 03-23-2010 at 06:58 PM.
|