mishmom
12-13-2011, 03:35 AM
Hey All, I've been away from GCM for probably a year or so. It just got to be too much online time for me. But I'm now dealing with some new four year old issues and feeling like I need some help! :-/
Does anyone know of some good GCM threads about dealing with 4 year olds?
Also, can anyone direct me to some discussions about consequences. DH and I seem to have unknowingly slipped into more punitive methods... more time outs, removing of priveledges . We're both struggling with the need for "consequences". Sometimes the natural consequence like in this scenario don't work :
Lunch time:
Me: Please sit in your chair and eat
Child: (10 seconds later) climbing everywhere (falls off chair, screaming because she hurt her foot... not seriously)
Me: Place child in the chair "chairs are made for sitting, if you stand on them you may get hurt (again)"
Child: climbs again and falls & spills soup simultaneously (not 10 seconds after putting her back in the chair.)
Me: as I'm getting new soup... she's climbing on other chairs... "Come here. Stop climbing."
Child: Still climbing.
Me::mad Time out....
It seems like she got some pretty natural consenquences. Fell twice. Spilled her soup... (however, I did replace it with new soup.) But sometimes the natural consequence doesn't tap into a "felt need." Even imposed, but still natural consequences... like if you're misusing markers, you don't get to use them anymore... sometimes don't resonate. She just doesn't care. It doesn't cause her to change her behavior because it's not a "Felt need."
Do you all know what I'm talking about with "felt needs"? I work in community development... and we talk alot about felt needs. Like for instance, if a community has bad water... They may all come to me saying that they have diarrhea and need medicine for it. I can tell them til I'm blue in the face that they need a new water system...but it's not a felt need until there is some educaton. The felt need is the pressing need of diarrhea treatment. And until that is resolved they cannot focus on the larger issue of water treatment.
Bear with me. I didn't really intend to write a big long post, so I don't really have everything thought out... was just going to ask for some links... but since I'm here I might as well finish.
Ok stay with me as I flesh out a situation with a teengirl I'm discipling (who also lives with us.) We meet weekly and talk about her life and the bible (it's awesome by the way!) She wants to go to bible school next year, so I've started giving her tiny bits of "homework" like journaling about this topic or that topic, or studying these few verses in preparation for the next week. But a couple times she has failed to finish her home work in preference for watching TV. So in those instances, I removed her TV priveledges until she could finish the homework (:shrug3) (which by the way, was all of 2 hours that she didn't get to watch!) . In a real school the consequence for not doing homework is poor grades. I know that the true natural consequence for not doing this homework is that she doesn't get the benefit of connecting with her Father in Heaven... But that is not her felt need. The lack of TV was her felt need... it was more important in motivating her to accomplish her homework. Once she did it she had connected with the Father and was in a really great place again.... but my point is sometimes you have to work with the felt need in order to proceed to the real need! Does that make sense?
So now on to my four year old. I want my four year old to learn to trust and obey me. To trust me when I say, "please don't stand on that chair, I don't want you to get hurt." I want her to learn that I give her rules and boundries to keep her from getting hurt and because I love her. I want her to learn these things so that she'll understand them in relation to God and will be able to trust Him in the ways he leads her. BUT this is not her felt need at the moment.. her felt need is "I want to wear a dress" So I'm so often we find ourseles providing consequences like this: "please stay in your chair or you will not allowed to wear a dress today." Because these are the things that truly motivate her. Even falling down and hurting her foot don't really matter.... but wearing a dress. That is enough to change for.
Ok, so now I'm imagining all the possible responses.
1) It sounds like your child needs more opportunitites to climb. Well yes that's probably true in general. But on the day this particular incident occured, we had just returned from a play date at the park!
2) I don't know the right terminology, but it seems like I've read discussions about changing outside behavior and not really changing the inner motivations. Is this what we're doing if we say "don't climb on the chair or you can't wear a dress? " I don't want to do that.
Honestly, I've been struggling with the philosophy of consequences for a long time. About a year ago on a thread here at GCM someone said something like "If you can't think of a natural consequence that can be applied in the moment, it's better to not give a consequence at all." And that phrase has been bouncing around in my head for a whole year... and it just doesn't sit right with me. All of our actions have consequences... many of them are unseen and consequences that occur in the heart. I know that if I lie... even if no one ever finds out and there are no real life repercussions... that sin has caused some separation between me and the Father.... that's a consequence that I'm aware of ... But my four year old isn't as able to be aware of the break in relationship that occurs when she disobeys (which is one of the natural consequences.) .... Which is why it feels like I should be enforcing "felt need" consequences... iykwim?
Oh gosh. now I'm just rambling. I'll stop now. :yes. I'd appreciate your constructive ideas and/or links... as I know these things have probably been discussed tons of times here at GCM! :)
Thanks everyone. It's nice to be back. :heart
Does anyone know of some good GCM threads about dealing with 4 year olds?
Also, can anyone direct me to some discussions about consequences. DH and I seem to have unknowingly slipped into more punitive methods... more time outs, removing of priveledges . We're both struggling with the need for "consequences". Sometimes the natural consequence like in this scenario don't work :
Lunch time:
Me: Please sit in your chair and eat
Child: (10 seconds later) climbing everywhere (falls off chair, screaming because she hurt her foot... not seriously)
Me: Place child in the chair "chairs are made for sitting, if you stand on them you may get hurt (again)"
Child: climbs again and falls & spills soup simultaneously (not 10 seconds after putting her back in the chair.)
Me: as I'm getting new soup... she's climbing on other chairs... "Come here. Stop climbing."
Child: Still climbing.
Me::mad Time out....
It seems like she got some pretty natural consenquences. Fell twice. Spilled her soup... (however, I did replace it with new soup.) But sometimes the natural consequence doesn't tap into a "felt need." Even imposed, but still natural consequences... like if you're misusing markers, you don't get to use them anymore... sometimes don't resonate. She just doesn't care. It doesn't cause her to change her behavior because it's not a "Felt need."
Do you all know what I'm talking about with "felt needs"? I work in community development... and we talk alot about felt needs. Like for instance, if a community has bad water... They may all come to me saying that they have diarrhea and need medicine for it. I can tell them til I'm blue in the face that they need a new water system...but it's not a felt need until there is some educaton. The felt need is the pressing need of diarrhea treatment. And until that is resolved they cannot focus on the larger issue of water treatment.
Bear with me. I didn't really intend to write a big long post, so I don't really have everything thought out... was just going to ask for some links... but since I'm here I might as well finish.
Ok stay with me as I flesh out a situation with a teengirl I'm discipling (who also lives with us.) We meet weekly and talk about her life and the bible (it's awesome by the way!) She wants to go to bible school next year, so I've started giving her tiny bits of "homework" like journaling about this topic or that topic, or studying these few verses in preparation for the next week. But a couple times she has failed to finish her home work in preference for watching TV. So in those instances, I removed her TV priveledges until she could finish the homework (:shrug3) (which by the way, was all of 2 hours that she didn't get to watch!) . In a real school the consequence for not doing homework is poor grades. I know that the true natural consequence for not doing this homework is that she doesn't get the benefit of connecting with her Father in Heaven... But that is not her felt need. The lack of TV was her felt need... it was more important in motivating her to accomplish her homework. Once she did it she had connected with the Father and was in a really great place again.... but my point is sometimes you have to work with the felt need in order to proceed to the real need! Does that make sense?
So now on to my four year old. I want my four year old to learn to trust and obey me. To trust me when I say, "please don't stand on that chair, I don't want you to get hurt." I want her to learn that I give her rules and boundries to keep her from getting hurt and because I love her. I want her to learn these things so that she'll understand them in relation to God and will be able to trust Him in the ways he leads her. BUT this is not her felt need at the moment.. her felt need is "I want to wear a dress" So I'm so often we find ourseles providing consequences like this: "please stay in your chair or you will not allowed to wear a dress today." Because these are the things that truly motivate her. Even falling down and hurting her foot don't really matter.... but wearing a dress. That is enough to change for.
Ok, so now I'm imagining all the possible responses.
1) It sounds like your child needs more opportunitites to climb. Well yes that's probably true in general. But on the day this particular incident occured, we had just returned from a play date at the park!
2) I don't know the right terminology, but it seems like I've read discussions about changing outside behavior and not really changing the inner motivations. Is this what we're doing if we say "don't climb on the chair or you can't wear a dress? " I don't want to do that.
Honestly, I've been struggling with the philosophy of consequences for a long time. About a year ago on a thread here at GCM someone said something like "If you can't think of a natural consequence that can be applied in the moment, it's better to not give a consequence at all." And that phrase has been bouncing around in my head for a whole year... and it just doesn't sit right with me. All of our actions have consequences... many of them are unseen and consequences that occur in the heart. I know that if I lie... even if no one ever finds out and there are no real life repercussions... that sin has caused some separation between me and the Father.... that's a consequence that I'm aware of ... But my four year old isn't as able to be aware of the break in relationship that occurs when she disobeys (which is one of the natural consequences.) .... Which is why it feels like I should be enforcing "felt need" consequences... iykwim?
Oh gosh. now I'm just rambling. I'll stop now. :yes. I'd appreciate your constructive ideas and/or links... as I know these things have probably been discussed tons of times here at GCM! :)
Thanks everyone. It's nice to be back. :heart